BRAND LGBTQ+ REPRESENTATION
Delivering Authentic Inclusiveness
Wilhelm Habla
Researcher and Visual Designer
Case Study
SFSU DES 324 GW
About this project
Through this project, our group investigated the fine line between authentic inclusivity and performative gestures in LGBTQ+ brand identities.
Using survey questions, interviews, and existIng research, the study explored the perceptions and needs of the LGBTQ+ community regarding brand representation. The study aimed to understand how brands can engage and support marginalized communities authentically.
Target Group
San Francisco State University's LGBTQ+ community
The Challenge
Brands need authentic representations rather than performative gestures
Integrate inclusivity beyond logo changes, and to foster ongoing support for the LGBTQ+ community.
The Solution
Project began in San Francisco and expanded our resources online for a broader perspective.
Finding a balance between genuine inclusivity and surface-level gestures in representations of the LGBTQ+ community.
Objectives
Explore San Francisco State University students' perceptions of LGBTQ+ inclusivity in brand identities.
Identify the challenges and pitfalls of brand representation of LGBTQ+.
Develop strategies to spread awareness about how the LGBTQ+ community is used during Pride month to increase the brand’s sales through posters and social media posts.
Design Process
The original goal was to design a poster that would show the inclusivity of brands for the LGBtQ+ community. But the thing about these designs is that they don’t have that “IT” that shows the message of the project.
Sketches
After the research, I started diving in deeper to the articles and resources that our group had. I made a few sketches that shows rainbow-washing of brands in the market.
Final Work
The poster is designed to draw attention to the issue of brands exploiting LGBTQ+ support for profit, despite lacking genuine commitment to the community's cause.The focal point of the poster is a product bearing a rainbow logo typically associated with LGBTQ+ support. However, the "sale" price tag highlights the profit motive over genuine advocacy. Despite lacking authentic support, brands use the rainbow symbol solely for financial gain. Why “Pride for sale?”, takes center stage, capturing immediate attention and delivering the core message of why we should be aware of these brands using the community to gain more sales. Peers are being encouraged to boycott these brands, so they will not have to pretend to support the LGBTQ+ community in the future.
These are the mockups that I have for this project, showing different products on the poster, and another message that says “Have you ever heard of rainbow washing
The poster utilizes compelling visual rhetoric by presenting a clear and effective image, urging viewers to reflect on the gap between symbolic support and genuine advocacy.
It appeals to the audience's ethical sensibilities (ethos) by exposing the misuse of symbols associated with social causes for commercial purposes. Additionally, it triggers an emotional response (pathos) by highlighting the exploitation of a meaningful symbol, potentially evoking empathy or anger.
Here’s another mockup that shows the controversial beer company. Before I forget to tell you, this poster provides a QR code that will bring you to a link where you can find articles and online posts about the issue which brand shows genuine and fake support?